method · full disclosure
How we score: the model behind every number
A score you cannot interrogate is just a mood. This page publishes the whole machine — criteria, weights, what moves a number up or down, and when the table gets re-scored — so a reader can disagree with the output by pointing at the exact input.
What are the criteria and weights?
Five criteria, weighted by how much each one protects the reader's money and time: operator reliability 32%, payout speed 24%, games and providers 20%, terms 14%, support and localisation 10%. The weights are an editorial position, published so they can be argued with — a reader who weighs history above paperwork will re-rank the same facts differently, and legitimately.
| Criterion | Weight | What it asks | What earns points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator reliability | 32% | Can the reader verify who runs this? | Named company · licence number · register entry · domain match |
| Payout speed | 24% | Will money arrive, and how predictably? | Published account-wide window · fast confirmed rails |
| Games & providers | 20% | Is the product worth the visit? | Catalogue depth and organisation · live product quality |
| Terms | 14% | Are conditions clear before money moves? | Readable bonus terms · visible limits · clarity over generosity |
| Support & localisation | 10% | Can a player in Bangladesh get help? | Round-the-clock channels · Bengali and English service |
Where do the facts come from?
From what operators publish themselves: footers, cashier rules, terms pages — plus the public registers those details point into. We quote third-party scores and complaint counts nowhere, because a complaint means nothing until you know which brand, which rule and which stage it describes. Where a fact is not published, its absence is recorded as the finding.
Two files show the policy at its edges. The leader's file is what a complete paper trail looks like — company, number, register, window, all checkable without trusting us. The last file is the opposite edge: the operating company is not named on the site, so the heaviest criterion cannot be completed, and the score carries that fact rather than our speculation about it.
Honest gaps go in every file by design — the leader's youth and missing phone line are printed in its own balance sheet. A table where the first place has no «against» column is advertising, and readers can tell.
When does the index change?
Each page carries one visible «updated» date that covers everything on it. The table is re-scored when an input changes materially — a licence event, a disclosure appearing or disappearing, a cashier restructuring — not on a cosmetic schedule. Between dates, the binding source for any operator detail is that operator's own site.
Corrections outrank everything else in the desk's inbox: if a fact in any file no longer matches what the operator publishes, one short message with the page and the change is the most useful thing a reader can send.
Commercial disclosure, stated where the money is: some operator links pay a referral fee. The model on this page is the whole defence against that incentive — the weights are fixed, published and identical for all six files, which means the only way to move a score is to change a fact, and facts here are the checkable kind.